See more articles about "Programming "

TI 83 Additional Accumulation All-overs



 27 July 02:18   

    In the antecedent program a characterization was written:

    


    text:

     .db Hello, World,0


    text: is a label. Labels are never called and consistently end with a colon. They mark a abode in a program. You can jump to a characterization by using jp labelname:

    
.NOLIST

    #define END .end

    #define end .end

    #define equ .equ

    #include ti83plus.inc

    .LIST

     .org 9D93h

     .db $BB,$6D

     jp clearscreen ;here it is

     ld a,0

     ld (CURCOL),a

     ld a,0

     ld (CURROW),a

     ld hl,text

     B_CALL(_PutS)

     ret

    text:

     .db Text,0

    clearscreen: ;and actuality it goes

     B_CALL(_ClrLCDFull)

     ret

    .end

    end


    (B_CALL(_ClrLCDFull) clears the screen.) The program aloft clears the awning but never displayes text. Why? Because jp clearscreen automatically all-overs to the characterization clearscreen and skips over all the argument affectation code.

    By the way, the being followed by the semicolon are comments: they are acclimated to explain the cipher and are abandoned by the compiler. (The compiler Interface' onMouseOver="tip('infobox1')" onMouseOut="untip()" target='_parent'> compiler is the program which converts the cipher you address to cipher a apparatus can read.)

    jr is a jumping apprenticeship agnate to jp, but with a few important differences. Its one byte abate (this may not assume like a lot, but it can add up); however, clashing jp (which can jump to any address), jr can alone jump to a characterization thats up to 127 bytes advanced or up to 128 bytes astern in your code. So, use jp if the characterization is far abroad but contrarily use jr. In fact, you may wish to consistently use jr, because if you abridge an absurdity will be alternate if the characterization is too distant.

    The jump in the aloft program could be replaced with jr:

    
.NOLIST

    #define END .end

    #define end .end

    #define equ .equ

    #include ti83plus.inc

    .LIST

     .org 9D93h

     .db $BB,$6D

     jr clearscreen ;this saves space!


    Imagine if you wish to jump about and then go back. Use alarm and ret:

    
.NOLIST

    #define END .end

    #define end .end

    #define equ .equ

    #include ti83plus.inc

    .LIST

     .org 9D93h

     .db $BB,$6D

     alarm clearscreen ;1. actuality it is

     ld a,0 ;4. to here

     ld (CURCOL),a

     ld a,0

     ld (CURROW),a

     ld hl,text

     B_CALL(_PutS)

     ret ;5. and ends

    text:

     .db Text,0

    clearscreen: ;2. actuality it goes

     B_CALL(_ClrLCDFull)

     ret ;3. then it comes back

    .end

    end


    As you can see, the first ret (right afterwards the _ClrLCDFull) went aback to the alarm command. Then, the additional ret concluded the program. You can anticipate of your program as one big alarm routine, with the catastrophe ret traveling aback to the capital calculator. Warning: Calls baffle with stacks.

    These all-overs can be accumulated with cipher abstruse in after sections.

    


 


 define, program, label, clearscreen, clrlcdfull, jumps, nolist, ti83plus, 9d93h, , define end, inc list, list org, org 9d93h, ti83plus inc, equ include, define equ, equ equ, nolist define, equ include ti83plus, plus assembly jumps,

Share TI 83 Additional Accumulation All-overs:
Digg it!   Google Bookmarks   Del.icio.us   Yahoo! MyWeb   Furl  Binklist   Reddit!   Stumble Upon   Technorati   Windows Live   Bookmark

Text link code :
Hyper link code:

Also see ...

Csharp NET framework Amount types
Amount TypesData types, such as integers and floating point numbers that are affected if they are anesthetized as arguments (that is, they are anesthetized by value). In the .NET Framework, these are alleged amount types. The runtime supports two kinds of amount types: and .Value types are

Csharp NET framework Nullable blazon
Nullable TypeSupport for nullability beyond all types, including amount types, is capital if interacting with databases, yet accepted purpose programming languages accept historically provided little or no abutment in this area. Some approaches is for administration nulls and amount types after

Csharp NET framework Attributes
AttributesMuch of the C accent enables the programmer to specify allegorical advice about the entities authentic in the program. For example, the accessibility of a adjustment in a chic is defined by decorating it with the method modifiers public, protected, internal, and private. C enable

xsearch
function achievement = xsearch3()% all encompassing beheld seek architecture% started 12/06/2005% accepted 12/06/2005% Todd S. Horowitzglobal screenRect MainWindow% this bit should create the cipher windows/macos9 portableif strcmp(computer, PCWIN) warning off MAT

Cryptography Addendum
Cryptography is a greek chat which agency Abstruse WritingImportant Uses of Cryptography 1. Assure acquaintance of bulletin (Achieved with Encryption Algorithms) 2. Accommodate character for affidavit (Achieved with Agee Encryption Algorithms, agenda signature algorithms) 3. Verify a

X86 Accumulation X86 Architectonics
The x86 architectonics has 8 General Purpose Registers (GPR), 6 Articulation Registers, 1 Flags Annals and an Apprenticeship Pointer.The 8 GPRs are (the adjustment in which they are authentic is the aforementioned that is acclimated in a advance to assemblage operation):EAX : Accumulato

X86 Accumulation GAS Syntax
Examples in this commodity are created using the AT&T accumulation syntax acclimated in GNU AS. The capital advantage of using this syntax is its affinity with the GCC inline accumulation syntax. However, this is not the alone syntax that is acclimated to represent x86 operations. For example, N

X86 Accumulation Amphibian Point
The aboriginal x86 ancestors associates had a separate algebraic coprocessor that would handle the amphibian point arithmetic. The aboriginal coprocessor was the 8087, and all FPUs back accept been dubbed x87 chips. After variants chip the amphibian point assemblage (FPU) into the chip itself. A

X86 Accumulation High-Level Languages
The first compilers were artlessly argument translators that adapted a high level accent into accumulation language. The accumulation accent cipher was then fed into an assembler, to make the final apparatus cipher output. The GCC compiler still performs this arrangement (code is aggregate into

X86 Accumulation MASM Syntax
This page will explain x86 Programming using MASM syntax, and will aswell altercate how to use the macro capabilities of MASM. Additional assemblers, such as NASM and FASM use syntax agnate to that of MASM, and accordingly this page will altercate those assemblers as well. MASM instructions